Wednesday 8 February 2012

The Curious Case of Serena Williams

The enigma that is Serena Jameka Williams can probably best be summed up by watching her recent Fed Cup match against Belarus vs Anastasia Yakimova.
Yakimova an opponent ranked 53 places below Serena, battled hard and took the first set 7-5 playing consistently and well above her 65th ranking. But as has been the case throughout Williams career, the result and dynamic of the match wasn't about what her opponent was doing, but how Serena was playing and acting on court.




The opening set was full of 'Serena Drama' with a racket smashed, inconsolable head shakes and hand gestures, and verbal beration all directed towards herself.
This 'dark side' to Serena has reared its ugly head on occasions, most notably twice in New York; once in 2009 against Clijsters and then in last years final vs Sam Stosur. Despite arguably being the most naturally talented woman to step foot on a tennis court, many would argue that Serena's attitude and temperament has stopped her legacy being even greater, up there with the likes of Graf and Navratilova.
Comments made in Brisbane earlier this year made clear that tennis is not a sport she passionately loves, but a means to an end. A way to win, and be successful. Remarks and attitudes like this have meant that despite her immense talent, at times lack of commitment and preparation have left her short in big matches against more match sharp players.

Whilst the first set showed Serena at her worst and most frustrating, the second two sets (both won with a 6-1 scoreline) showed her at her imperious best. For my money, no more complete a tennis player has played the womens game. Most focus on her massive serve and powerful groundies, but Williams movement, foot speed, point construction and mental intensity are all massive factors which elevate her above being just a ballbasher.
Yakimova's form dropped slightly, but her consistency just couldn't hold up to the bombardment of a wounded Serena, who was visibly angry at herself for losing a set to a player who really shouldn't get close to beating her.
The head shakes of the first set were replaced by fist pumps and 'come-on's' reminiscent of the fiercesome competitor that has so far captured 13 major titles, the most of an active player.

Effectively, the glum and uninspired Serena, and the pumped up and intense Serena seem like two completely different personalities, trapped inside one body. However, i think that without the attitude Serena wouldn't be the player she is today, or has been throughout her illustrious career.
Serena's angry and at times self-loathing personality on court, has often to me been the inspiration behind some of her comebacks and achievements.
Many a time we've witnessed her play sub-par tennis for the majority of the match and turn it around almost at the push of a button. Her frustration on court is not all down to 'not loving' tennis, but because she knows what she is capable of and demands no less from herself everytime she takes to the court. Without a doubt, this makes her frustrating to watch, and many will call her sulky and childish, but if Serena had a levelled attitude and settled for playing averagely (which for her would still make her a top 10 player) then would she have achieved all that she has.....I would say No!

Characters like Serena don't come around too often in a very subdued game like Tennis. Her fiesty personality may not be to everyone's taste , but as she creeps past 30, one thing is for sure. We won't be celebrating or chastising her for too much longer, and when she's gone her celebrity and presence will be sorely missed.
          
                                                                        

Watch this point, and ask yourself again if Serena loves tennis? It may annoy her from time to time, but she's still here, and once she's gone i get a feeling both we and she will appreciate what she achieved in the sport!





DJT











                                                                   

Wednesday 1 February 2012

How to craft the perfect player

After my first few blogs took a serious route, i thought it was about time i had a bit of fun (not that regular tennis isn't fun) and gave my thoughts on a more relaxed and informal topic, so i thought how about i try and make my perfect player.
The motivation behind writing this particular piece came from a conversation i had with a friend of  mine just this morning. My friend (a casual tennis fan) said 'The Djoko-Nadal final that was pretty much perfect tennis right?' which got me to thinking, obviously 'perfection' isn't possible in a subjective sport, but how close is this current men's era to being 'perfect'.
If we were to throw aside changes in racket technology, how would the Federers and Nadals match up against the Borg's and Mcenroes of years gone by. Obviously the fitness and intensity of the game has increased seven fold, but based on pure talent, who wins basically. Well, i came to the conclusion that in terms of variety and game plan the older generation seemed to have more nouse and play better all round games, but the current stars serve and hit harder and move better. So after all that, i decided that 'perfection' could be achieved by a mix and match of the two so here goes :


Serve: How can you not go with Sampras here, 'Pistol Pete' may not have had as big a serve as a Roddick or a Karlovic, but it always got him out of trouble and once he got a break, he never lost it back!




Return: Agassi has never been matched for a two handed return. So great that it was a key part of his revival in his late 20's early 30's and kept him competitive up til 35!



Forehand: Federer takes this for having such a lethal combination of pace and accuracy, and singularly dominating tennis through this shot for most of the early/mid noughties!


Backhand: Must go to Djokovic, the last 18 months this has been the shot to go up another gear and really help him dominate his opponentts from the back of the court!

Volleys: Mcenroe without a shadow of a doubt. Deft touch, unbelievable feel, and quick hands. GOAT
His volley at 0:46 is testament to this.



Movement: Tough between Rafa and Borg but after his display in the Djokovic final the other day he just about gets the nod.






So there it is, my so called 'Perfect Player', feel free to leave any thoughts or comments, would love to hear opinions on this. Womens perfect player discussed tommorow :)






DJT